Read the texts
Cross-Account Patterns
These patterns describe where the Qur'an places together comparable elements that the Bible narrates in separate accounts. They do not establish dependence, identity, chronology, or motive.
Strong cross-account patterns
Talut's river test
Q 2 places a river test inside Talut's campaign before David kills Jalut. Judges places a water-selection test in Gideon's separate campaign; 1 Samuel places Saul and David's Goliath episode in another setting.
What the texts do not establish: The texts do not identify Talut as Saul, call the two water tests the same event, or state dependence.
Open related story →Moses at Midian and marriage service
Q 28 places Moses at Midian's well with two women and their flocks, then gives a marriage term of eight or ten years of service. Exodus has Moses' Midian/well/daughters/marriage setting; Genesis has Jacob's marriage-for-years-of-service arrangement.
What the texts do not establish: The texts do not state that the two accounts are connected. The women and flock already occur in Exodus, not only in Genesis.
Open related story →Possible patterns; the text alone cannot establish a connection
The cow, a killing, and a corpse
Q 2 puts a specified cow command beside an unexplained killing and a command involving the slain person. Numbers has a red-heifer purity law; Deuteronomy has an unsolved-killing heifer rite.
What the texts do not establish: The animal requirements, action, and outcome differ. Neither biblical law strikes a corpse with part of the animal or reports a revival.
Open related story →Haman, Pharaoh, and the tower
Q 28 and Q 40 place Haman with Pharaoh in Moses' setting and connect him with a tower. Exodus has no Haman; Esther names Haman in another court; Genesis narrates Babel's tower.
What the texts do not establish: A shared name does not establish that the Qur'anic Haman is Esther's Haman. The texts do not identify them as one person or settle chronology.
Open related story →Abraham, idols, and fire
Q 21 connects Abraham's challenge to idols with preservation in fire. Genesis has Abraham without that fire episode; Daniel has named Judean men preserved in a furnace after refusing an image.
What the texts do not establish: Idol conflict and fire-preservation are not distinctive enough on their own to establish a connection.
Open related story →David's legal scene
Q 38 has two adversaries, ninety-nine ewes, David's judgment, and repentance. Nathan's parable to David uses a rich man and a poor man's one ewe; Solomon's famous formal judgment is a separate biblical scene.
What the texts do not establish: The Qur'anic dispute closely resembles Nathan's parable, but the texts do not require a feature from Solomon's judgment.
Open related story →Not classed from the primary texts
The Samiri in the golden-calf account
Exodus names Aaron as the craftsman of the calf. Q 20 presents the Samiri as producing the calf and Aaron as warning the people.
What the texts do not establish: Sahih International does not define Samiri as an ethnic Samaritan. The primary texts do not establish the figure's identity, date, or a link to later groups.
Open related story →Moses striking the rock
Q 2 and Q 7 say Moses strikes a rock and twelve springs emerge. Exodus already has Moses strike a rock for water; Numbers has another rock-and-water event.
What the texts do not establish: The twelve springs occur in neither biblical rock account. This difference does not establish that the Qur'an combines the two biblical incidents.
Open related story →Mary, 'Imran, and Aaron
The Qur'an calls Mary daughter of 'Imran and reports that her people call her sister of Aaron. Exodus identifies Aaron and Moses as sons of Amram; Luke identifies Jesus' mother as Mary.
What the texts do not establish: Neither text explains the Qur'anic expressions or explicitly equates 'Imran with Amram. This is an unresolved identity question.
Open related story →Clay birds, cradle speech, and the table
The Qur'an narrates Jesus making birds from clay, speaking in the cradle, and a table sent down from heaven. The Bible does not narrate those episodes.
What the texts do not establish: Broad motifs such as meal, clay, breath, or healing mud are not enough to establish a cross-account pattern.
Open related story →Other shared-story differences
The full story audit also reviewed Adam, Cain and Abel, Noah, Abraham's sacrifice, Joseph, Moses and the unnamed servant, Qarun/Korah, Solomon, Elijah, Jonah, Zechariah and John, Jesus' ministry, and the crucifixion.
What the texts do not establish: These records contain agreements, additions, omissions, ambiguities, or contradictions. A narrative difference alone is not a cross-account pattern.